skatingforums

On the Ice => The Pro Shop => Topic started by: Bill_S on July 15, 2019, 02:30:52 PM

Title: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on July 15, 2019, 02:30:52 PM
I've been considering which Riedell model to buy for my next skates. I've been in Gold Stars, but they are ancient. I like how they held up over the years, but I wish I could get a bit more fore-aft flex. In particular, when doing back crossovers I'd like to bend forward a bit more.

I see that Riedell has a boot called the 2010 Fusion. It features only 3 rows of hooks, so I assume the top is a bit shorter and that should allow more flex. I would hope that it offers about the same lateral support as my current skates.

Has anyone here used them?

-----

My other options are the Silver Star and the Aria. I suspect the Aria is very stiff (too much for my level), but it appears to have a leather lining like my old Gold Stars. The new Silver Star appears to have a "perforated micro-fiber lining", which would concern me about longevity.

I had Bronze Stars about 18 years ago, but they broke down within a year. The boot design may have changed since then, but I'd rather avoid them out of caution.
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: tstop4me on July 16, 2019, 06:54:32 AM
I hope you get responses from skaters who have actually worn the 2010 Fusion.   In the meanwhile, I'll pass along a bit of info that may be useful. 

A couple of years ago, a girl at my rink wore them.  She was constantly having problems lacing them up tight enough.  One day she asked me for help.  I re-laced them as tight as I could, but she said they were still too loose at the top of the boots.  I had previously read about them before when I was shopping for boots, and knew they were designed that way:  "The fresh, new 2010 Fusion features an aggressive design allowing maximum forward and backward flexibility," according to Riedell.  The tongue and the uppers are designed such that, even when laced tight, there is a gap between the tongue liner and the portion of the shin bone near the top of the boot.  So definitely a different fit from traditional Riedells (I have previously skated in 220/Gold Star/Royal).  My guess is it was Riedell's initial response to Edea; in addition to the extra flex, the 2010 Fusion is also touted as a lightweight boot.   (I at least applaud them for leaving out the Swarovski crystals and scalloped cutouts.  :-))

I told her that these boots were specifically designed to allow extra space there.   I asked her why she bought that model, if she didn't want that.  "They look really cool," she replied. 

Anyway, since you are specifically looking for more forward/backward flex, definitely a potential candidate for you to consider. 

I ended up getting Jackson Elite Suede, which also has a microfiber lining.  I too was concerned with longevity relative to leather.  But I've worn them for 4+ yrs now (averaging ~7 hrs/week almost year round) ... and, as Little Miss Sunbeam would say, "Look Mom, no holes!"
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on July 16, 2019, 07:37:27 AM
Thanks for that info. I suspected that there would be few people here that have worn them, so I'm not surprised at the "radio silence".

The anecdote about the other skater with them is useful. It makes me wonder if it is too much of a good thing. Also thanks for the info about the micro-fiber linings. The lining durability is reassuring. It appears that a good portion of Riedell's lineup has gone that way.

I wore through the leather lining of my first pair of Gold Stars in less than 5 years, but I was skating 16 hours per week then.

These photos show how my old 2003 Gold Star boots looked when I looked for a replacement pair in 2007.

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/worn-skate-lining1.jpg)

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/worn-skates001b.jpg)

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/broken_arch.jpg)

Even the sole and heel had started to de-laminate. I show the pictures to show why I want something that's durable, and I must admit that reading "micro-fiber lining" made me twitch a little.

With your information, I'm favoring the Riedell Silver Star. I wish that the popular Jackson fitter in Lyndhurst (Cleveland area) were closer. I'd consider Jacksons too.
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: tstop4me on July 16, 2019, 08:38:04 AM
Quote from: Bill_S on July 16, 2019, 07:37:27 AM
With your information, I'm favoring the Riedell Silver Star.
Hey, don't dismiss the Aria.  Word out on the ice is that the kangaroo linings help you with your jumps.  :-)

But, I see the latest listing doesn't mention kangaroo anymore:  "The Aria is now improved with a stronger perforated leather lining that has an antimicrobrial treatement [sic] for long wear."  Maybe there's old stock left, though.
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: CaraSkates on July 16, 2019, 04:44:33 PM
I wear Fusion boots and have been in them for 10+ years now, on my 4th pair. I love them and will never go back to a higher cut boot.

I do high level dance and freestyle in them and easily get 2.5-3yrs out of a boot, that's skating 4-5 days a week, working on junior moves, pregold/gold dances, I compete gold free skate. It's the perfect combo of enough support for freestyle, enough bend and toe point for dance.
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on July 16, 2019, 05:18:05 PM
Thank you for that! Perfect! They are back in the running.

I've always feared that having the ability to more easily bend forward/backward might compromise the lateral support. It's good to know that you switch between disciplines because I'll be doing something very similar. I'm not a big jumper, but do it once in a while.

Thanks!
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on July 22, 2019, 09:59:10 AM
I have an appointment for a fitting tomorrow at 11 am in Columbus. Yay!

Note to central-Ohio skaters: If anyone here wants to get in touch with Tony who does the fittings, skip emails and go straight to telephone.

Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on July 23, 2019, 03:05:46 PM
I spent 1-1/4 hours at the OSU ice rink in Columbus being fitted for new skates. Anthony (Tony) Habart is the fitter there.

First, the upshot:

I ordered two pairs of Riedell skates and two sets of blades.

1) I got Silver Stars and Aces to directly replace my current Gold Star/Coronation Ace skates. Tony said that the stiffness of the Silver Stars might exceed that of my 2007-model Gold Stars because of changes over time. But it should be close. I should feel comfortable in this combo.

2) I also ordered 2010 Fusion skates that have a shorter top to allow more forward/backward extension. I want to see if this helps with more knee bend in crossovers. I got MK Professional blades with the short 12" front rocker compared to the Ace's 27" front rocker. I also got my Jackson Synchro blades sharpened by Tony to 3/8" as another option when the boots arrive. I might also get some Skate Science Dance blades for a third option. Still thinking about that because they are thin dance blades and I can't sharpen them myself.

Some people have two cars. I will have two sets of skates. It's a bit indulgent for someone who is 69 years old, but what the heck.

-------

Now the backstory. I was a bit skeptical about the qualifications of the OSU fitter who replaced Duke, now retired. However, I learned that this fellow has been a figure skater since he was young, and has all his jumps including most doubles. He sometimes coaches too. He's a lefty, and spins CW, but he told me that he had a decent scratch, sit, and camel in the CCW direction too. He admitted that he never mastered the backspin in other than his native direction.

He's been in all sorts of boots and blades. Currently he's in Edea Concertos and Gold Seals. He never liked the Ice Fly. He's been in Graf, SP Teri, Riedell models including the Fusion that I was interested in (he brought out his pair to show me). His Fusions were equipped with Eclipse Pinnacle blades, Eclipse's version of Gold Seals.

In short, he won my trust as a fitter. My skepticism vanished after learning of his experiences.

Here's Tony...

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/fitting_osu_ice_rink-4-800px.jpg)

Super nice guy!

The fitting room at OSU is nothing to write home about. They don't stock much, so most skates will be ordered from Riedell. Delivery time for men's skate orders is 3-4 weeks.

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/fitting_osu_ice_rink-3-800px.jpg)

Tony brought out some samples of skates that were in stock to show their features. I really liked the Riedell Aria with its leather lining, but I feared that it would be way too stiff for my needs. He agreed.

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/fitting_osu_ice_rink-6-800px.jpg)

The woman's skate shown is a Silver Star, brought out for showing the heavily-padded linings. He said that they hold up well for most of his skaters, but gave no guarantee that they'd last 12 years like my old leather-lined Gold Stars. They have a LOT of padding inside, and he said that it will feel too tight until the padding sets a bit.

When he sharpened a pair of Jackson Synchro blades that I brought with me, he had the lightest touch on the Blademaster grinder.

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/fitting_osu_ice_rink-10-800px.jpg)

He was continually checking for level edges as he went. I liked what I saw here.

It was a good day, and I'm really glad that I could pick his brains during my appointment.
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: FigureSpins on July 23, 2019, 04:28:43 PM
I love your photo stories.  Hope the new skates, both pairs, fit perfectly!
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on July 23, 2019, 07:39:53 PM
Thanks! I aim to please.

I'm now thinking about how to store two pairs of skates. My current skates are stored on a maple skate rack.

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/skate_rack_done-29edt.jpg)

This is mounted to the side of a filing cabinet in my office. I was thinking about adding another skate rack and have both a cherry and a walnut rack left over from that little enterprise.

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/skate_rack2_walnut-800px.jpg)

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/skate_rack2_cherry-800px.jpg)

I noted  that I don't have space on that side of the filing cabinet to add another rack, but there's still the other side of it. There's some magnetically attached papers, etc, but they can move somewhere else. I've got a little work to do before the boots arrive.
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on August 21, 2019, 04:54:31 PM
Over four weeks of waiting for the new skates, and counting. Men's skates take so doggone long to order in!

I also learned through the grapevine that OSU's fitter Tony is leaving. If it's true, it's really a shame.
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: tstop4me on August 22, 2019, 07:05:37 AM
Quote from: Bill_S on August 21, 2019, 04:54:31 PM
Over four weeks of waiting for the new skates, and counting. Men's skates take so doggone long to order in!

I also learned through the grapevine that OSU's fitter Tony is leaving. If it's true, it's really a shame.
You should have Tony check on your order.  About 5 yrs ago, I ordered a pair of Jacksons.  The skate tech told me delivery time was typically 2 wks.  Three weeks, and still no boots.  I asked the skate tech to check.  The Jackson rep said he had no record of the order.  My skate tech was then about to resubmit the order, when the Jackson rep called back and said he found the order.  Fortunately, the boots were in stock, and I got them a week later.

If your boots are not in stock, however, you might have to wait a while longer, because many boot companies slow down production at this time of year (summer vacations).

I hope Tony hangs around long enough to complete your order.  About a year ago, we had a competent skate tech in a small local shop leave suddenly.  He was the only one in the shop experienced with figure skates; the two other techs were hockey guys only.  Some figure skaters had advanced boots (including customs) on order.  When the gear came in, they had to scramble to find another shop to handle the molding, mounting, sharpening, and adjustments.  All this at substantial extra expense, of course, since the gear had been purchased from a different shop.
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on August 22, 2019, 08:43:00 AM
I intend to call him today.

Heaven knows how many times that sort of thing has happened to me in the past.

My only hope is that Tony is snagged by Chiller Easton which had a decent sized space for a skate shop, and plenty of easy-access rink parking. But I won't hold my breath.
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on August 22, 2019, 09:10:54 AM
I just called. Tony resigned from the rink. The boots that were ordered were sitting on the shelf. The MK Pro blades were not in yet.

The person I talked to promised to look into the MK blade order, and call back. He said that he could do the fitting of the boots "because he's done them before". Hmmmm.

I suspect that it's a good thing that I mount my own blades to boots.
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: FigureSpins on August 22, 2019, 12:25:54 PM
Yep, your talents might result in a happy ending.  Hope it works out well!
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: tstop4me on August 22, 2019, 04:40:27 PM
Quote from: Bill_S on August 22, 2019, 09:10:54 AM
I just called. Tony resigned from the rink. The boots that were ordered were sitting on the shelf. The MK Pro blades were not in yet.

The person I talked to promised to look into the MK blade order, and call back. He said that he could do the fitting of the boots "because he's done them before". Hmmmm.

I suspect that it's a good thing that I mount my own blades to boots.
Since the other tech is of unknown competency, be sure to specify that he should not sharpen the new blades.  Some techs just sharpen new blades by default.
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on August 26, 2019, 06:38:13 PM
Christmas in August...

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/boots_blades_2019/skates_2019_new-40-800px.jpg)

I wish that Tony had still been there for a true fitting. The hockey-oriented guy gave me the boxes, and said to come back if they needed punched out. I asked that he not mount nor sharpen the blades. I'll do all this myself. The good news is that the skates and blades are nicely discounted from retail. They are modestly less expensive than Kinzie's Closet, the online retailer.

I got both Riedell 2010 Fusion and Riedell Silver Star boots. Some old men putt around in powerful Corvettes. Having two sets of skates is my old-man fantasy.

I purchased both boots in size 7 Medium. My street shoe size is generally men's size 8.

There's quite a difference in the design of the Fusion boots compared to the more traditional Silver Stars.

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/boots_blades_2019/skates_2019_new-22-800px.jpg)

I also got a pair of Coronation Aces and a pair of MK Professional blades.

I weighed the boots...

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/boots_blades_2019/skates_2019_new-46-800px.jpg)

(Fusions - 1.96 lbs)

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/boots_blades_2019/skates_2019_new-49-800px.jpg)

(Silver Star - 1.84 lbs)
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on August 26, 2019, 06:45:03 PM
[continued]

I will try to measure the profile of the Aces vs. the MK Pros. It's obvious that the spin rocker is different when holding them side-by-side. The drag pick of the Ace is lower to the ice than the Pro when measured from the mounting plate.

Ace...

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/boots_blades_2019/skates_2019_new-34-800px.jpg)

Pro...

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/boots_blades_2019/skates_2019_new-36-800px.jpg)

The blades weighed within 5 grams of each other.

An Ace (10-1/4" length) weighed 360 grams.

One MK Professional blade, same length, weighed 355 grams.

I haven't tried on the boots yet as I'm making measurements and noting details. I hope to report on differences in feel between the various boots and blades in the future, so it will be nice to have this data to refer to.

Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: masterblaster on August 26, 2019, 08:48:48 PM
This is so interesting, Bill! Thanks for the photos, especially of the spin rocker and drag pick of the two blades. It's so hard to find objective info about blade profiles and comparisons online.
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: MCsAngel2 on August 26, 2019, 10:40:14 PM
Ditto. For all I read comparing CA and MK Pro, I never heard that CA's drop pick was that much bigger. (But it makes sense because it's spin rocker is so defined). Can you take pics comparing the rear stanchion?

Any chance you own some Gold Stars and Gold Seals and can do the same comparison photographs??  :laugh:
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: MCsAngel2 on August 26, 2019, 10:45:57 PM
Quote from: Bill_S on August 26, 2019, 06:38:13 PM

I got both Riedell 2010 Fusion and Riedell Silver Star boots. Some old men putt around in powerful Corvettes. Having two sets of skates is my old-man fantasy.


I understand completely. Kudos for spending much, much less than you would on a classic muscle car.
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: MCsAngel2 on August 26, 2019, 10:49:29 PM
So in rereading the whole thread, I see that you intend to put the CAs on the silver stars and MK Pros on the Fusions? Because you have them swapped in the pics.

If that's so, I would be curious how the heel heights compare. Because it looks like the silver stars have an ever so slightly higher heel. If that's so and you put the CAs on those (I think they have a higher heel stanchion than MK Pro), they should feel significantly different from the other boots with the Pros.
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on August 27, 2019, 02:42:20 AM
I realized that I had swapped positions of the CA and MK blades after I had posted them. I still intend to put CA on the Silver Stars.

I will pursue more measurements and take more pictures after I get some "honey-do" tasks completed, and find some more time. Stay tuned!
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: tstop4me on August 27, 2019, 07:03:33 AM
Quote from: Bill_S on August 26, 2019, 06:45:03 PM
The drag pick of the Ace is lower to the ice than the Pro when measured from the mounting plate.

Ace...

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/boots_blades_2019/skates_2019_new-34-800px.jpg)

Pro...

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/boots_blades_2019/skates_2019_new-36-800px.jpg)
<<Emphasis added.>> I'm trying to parse that statement in view of the photos.  In the photos, the vertical distance from the bottom surface (not in contact with the boot) of the mounting plate to the drag pick is greater for the Ace than the Pro.   Is that correct?

At any rate, I'm looking forward to your detailed A-B comparison of the geometry of the two blades; in particular, the spin rocker profiles.  Wilson and MK haven't released their specs (at least I haven't been able to track them down).  Paramount did their own measurements, and everyone else appears to quote (or, more often, misquote) their measurements without attribution.   It'll be interesting what you find, because you're equipped to do more detailed measurements.
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on August 27, 2019, 08:06:04 AM
Quote from: tstop4me on August 27, 2019, 07:03:33 AM

In the photos, the vertical distance from the bottom surface (not in contact with the boot) of the mounting plate to the drag pick is greater for the Ace than the Pro.   Is that correct?


Yes, that's what I was trying to say. I didn't word it very well.

Also the ruler isn't pictured in quite the same orientation (sorry), but I held the camera with my right hand and things were a bit fiddly to hold in position. Consider this a rough measurement.

A couple more observation about the boots - the padded material on the upper heel and tongue of the Fusions is NOT some flimsy, fluffy material. It is dense and rubbery. Photos can give the impression of some light-duty sponge padding underneath, but it's much stouter than that.

Second, I was surprised when I saw the Fusions were slightly heavier than the Silver Stars. The cutouts and three lace-hooks per side construction give the impression of a lighter boot. Faced with this visual contradiction, I looked closely at the comparison photo closely and noted that the ankles are wider on the Fusions. I assume that the reduction of leather in some areas had to be compensated by strengthening the sides of the ankle. But it could be an illusion due to a different "splay" of the sides when untied. We'll see.

As the TV inspector said, "Very interesting!"
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on August 27, 2019, 06:17:25 PM
I did a little more investigating today. One thing that I noticed is that the fitter ordered 10-1/4" blades for these boots. I've always been in 10-1/2" blades with both older pairs of Gold Star boots.

I did notice that someone had removed one Fusion boot from its plastic baggie before I received them, and I assume it was done by the fitter to measure for blades. The Fusions measured a little less than 10.5", so I assume that they were the boots by which blade length was determined.

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/boots_blades_2019/boots_length_fusion.jpg)

The Silver Star boot measured 10.6" toe to heel.

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/boots_blades_2019/boots_length_silverstar.jpg)

These boots could have used 10-1/2" blades like my other boots in the past.

Apparently Fusion boots have a slightly shorter sole than the Star series.
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: MCsAngel2 on August 27, 2019, 06:43:14 PM
How do the heel heights compare?
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on August 27, 2019, 06:50:05 PM
Great question!

Both are 1.2" high.
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Loops on August 28, 2019, 02:52:46 AM
Directly measuring the heel height might be misleading.  I believe some bootmakers may cover the upper part of the heel/sole with the upper (see edeas and some risports).

Having said that, these are probably standard heels.  The boot descriptions seem to say "higher heel" or "high dance heel" or something of that ilk when the heels are higher.

I do get the feeling that things are trending towards higher heels so they may become standard.

I'll be honest- I have a nasty bunion on my right foot, and in street shoes can not support even the lowest heel.  I was previously in higher heeled dance boots (risport).  Now that I've switched (and expressely ordered a "standard" heel), I don't notice that much of a difference.  I feel much more a difference in the height of the sides of the skate and the tongue. But we all have our own experience/bodies to deal with.

I don't know what the actual difference is when they say "higher heel" but I bet it's probably only significant to those skating at higher levels, who have a greater ability to push things to a greater limit than I (in the same line as parabolics and other such features on blades).
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on August 28, 2019, 07:33:29 AM
FWIW, my old 2007 Gold Star boots also have a 1.2" high heel. It looks like Riedell hasn't changed that aspect of their boots, at least for the models that I've sampled.

I know what you mean about dealing with individual feet. I don't have a big toe joint in my right foot because of surgical removal back in 2012. I have the fitter determine boot size based on my larger left foot.
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: tstop4me on August 28, 2019, 08:00:30 AM
Quote from: Loops on August 28, 2019, 02:52:46 AM
Directly measuring the heel height might be misleading.  I believe some bootmakers may cover the upper part of the heel/sole with the upper (see edeas and some risports).

Having said that, these are probably standard heels.  The boot descriptions seem to say "higher heel" or "high dance heel" or something of that ilk when the heels are higher.

I do get the feeling that things are trending towards higher heels so they may become standard.
It gets a bit more complicated.  What's ultimately dispositive is how high the heel of your foot is raised with respect to the ball of your foot.  That height depends on both the height of the external boot heel and the height of the internal boot heel.  About four+ years ago, when I was shopping for new boots, a skate tech showed me a Graf and an Edea side-by-side.  On the outside, the heel heights appeared to be nominally the same.  But he told me, that inside the boot, the heel is higher in the Edea. 
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: tstop4me on August 28, 2019, 08:20:07 AM
Quote from: Bill_S on August 27, 2019, 06:17:25 PM
I did a little more investigating today. One thing that I noticed is that the fitter ordered 10-1/4" blades for these boots. I've always been in 10-1/2" blades with both older pairs of Gold Star boots.

I did notice that someone had removed one Fusion boot from its plastic baggie before I received them, and I assume it was done by the fitter to measure for blades. The Fusions measured a little less than 10.5", so I assume that they were the boots by which blade length was determined.


The Silver Star boot measured 10.6" toe to heel.


These boots could have used 10-1/2" blades like my other boots in the past.

Apparently Fusion boots have a slightly shorter sole than the Star series.
I believe that Riedell uses the traditional guideline for blade length:  target blade length is 1/4" less than the toe-to-heel boot length.  So, the 10-1/4" blade length satisfies this guideline. 

By the way, what size were your new boots, and were they the same size as your old boots? 

Here is Riedell's blade sizing chart; although they do caution that it's a guide, and that the actual boot should be measured:

https://ice.riedellskates.com/wp-content/uploads/Riedell-Ice-Blade-Length-Chart.pdf
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on August 28, 2019, 09:46:49 AM
The new boots are size 7M.

The 2007 Gold Stars (my current pair) are size 7-1/2 M. The sole length on the 2007 skates matches the new Silver Stars at 10.6" despite their half-size difference.

Going way back to 2002, I had size 7 M Gold Stars. They were also fitted with 10-1/2" blades, but the sole length of those was a bit longer at 10.7".

The old blades were selected by the fitter back in 2002 and 2007. They are both 10-1/2".

I wonder if the current wisdom of selecting blades 1/4" shorter than the sole has changed over the years? How critical is it really? So many questions!
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: FigureSpins on August 28, 2019, 11:38:58 AM
I remember comparing sole lengths on two different models.  One of them was "undercut," meaning the boot upper hung over the front of the sole more than the other, like a shelf.  Someone (maybe the late Don Klingbeil) had said that it affects blade length and mounting techniques, to ensure that the bottom toepick is in the exact correct position.

I once wore Gold Seals that were 1/4" too long.  (Poor, starving college student)  The late Bill Klingbeil mounted them with the extra plate length at the front and they worked fine for me for years.  A long time later, I had a fitter go ballistic that Bill did this but honestly, those skates were very stable and my balance was excellent!  (100 lbs, well, 80 pounds now - Yay, me! - so that might have had something to do with the balance, too.)
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: tstop4me on August 29, 2019, 08:13:10 AM
Quote from: Bill_S on August 28, 2019, 09:46:49 AM
I wonder if the current wisdom of selecting blades 1/4" shorter than the sole has changed over the years? How critical is it really? So many questions!

Quote from: FigureSpins on August 28, 2019, 11:38:58 AM
I remember comparing sole lengths on two different models.  One of them was "undercut," meaning the boot upper hung over the front of the sole more than the other, like a shelf.  Someone (maybe the late Don Klingbeil) had said that it affects blade length and mounting techniques, to ensure that the bottom toepick is in the exact correct position.

(a) I never tracked down any rationale for the 1/4" shorter guideline for traditional boots.   One advantage I've found is if you want to move the blades back a bit, you can do so without the heel plate overhanging the boot.  How much a problem this would be in practice, I don't know.  But I'm concerned about mounting plates (toe or heel) overhanging the side of the boot, should I fall and strike the protruding side of the mounting plate.

(b) Since blades come in 1/4" (or 1/3" in some instances) increments and boots come in finer increments, you can't always meet your target length.  Some techs want at least 1/4" gap and will leave a larger gap if needed (e.g., they will go down a size to a 3/8" gap, rather than leaving only a 1/8" gap).  Other techs will be happy with an 1/8" gap (rather than going down a size to a 3/8" gap).  How much all this translates to in practice ... beats me.  You don't know unless you do an A-B comparison (which in practice nobody does).

(c) Edea has a non-traditional design, with a shorter sole length (relative to traditional boots for a given shoe size) due to higher heel pitch and other design features.  They specifically say not to follow the traditional guideline, and to aim for a target blade length equal to the full sole length.  [It will be interesting whether Riedell uses new guidelines for the Elara and Vega boots.]

(d) Boot designs are getting more diversified, and it's becoming confusing what "sole length" is in relation to the foot.  As FigureSpins mentioned, in some boots, the front of the uppers overhangs the front of the sole.  Similarly, in some boots, the back of the uppers overhangs the back of the heel.  Adding to the mess, some heels are tapered from the top (where it joins the sole) to the bottom (where it joins the blade):  the total sole length measured from front tip of sole to back tip of heel is longer measured at the top of the heel than at the bottom of the heel.  The relationship of the foot to the blade gets all wacky.

(e) If you haven't sharpened the blades, and if you really prefer a longer blade, you should be able to exchange them.  Since Tony left, and you are handling your own mounting and sharpening, the shop should be agreeable to do this without charge.  [As an added plus, you can take measurements and see how blade features vary with length.]  This assumes you're willing to wait another week or so before trying out your new toys. 

(f) I've also had an issue in the past with the tech supplying me with a blade that I thought was too short (though he did follow Jackson's guidelines).  In the future, I'm going to wait for the boots to arrive first, and then specify the blade length I want (rather than leaving it up to the tech).

Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on September 02, 2019, 05:59:26 PM
I still haven't mounted blades yet, but I have laced the Fusions and wore them in the living room. I'm trying for a head-start on break-in. I'm going to need it because I barely have enough lace length for two hooks.

While not conclusive without being able to tie the upper hooks, I wonder if this is how the tongue will look with trousers when I skate?

(Please excuse the raggedy trousers. I wear them around the house in case I go into the shop to work on something.)

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/boots_blades_2019/boots_riedell_fusion_new-1-800px.jpg)

I'll have to keep an eye on that. I'm hoping that it might improve when I can tie the top hooks.

One feature really works well. I can toe-point with the best of them. The padded, low-cut rear on the boots allows for a lot of foot flexing.

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/boots_blades_2019/boots_riedell_fusion_new-10-800px.jpg)

As expected they are still uncomfortable to wear after an hour total. I get pins and needles in my feet after removing them, so there's some reduced circulation due to padding tightness. Fortunately, I haven't discovered any pressure points that would require punching out the boots.

I haven't laced up the Silver Stars yet. I've been reluctant to because my wife thinks that I bought only one pair of skates.  :-X

Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: MCsAngel2 on September 02, 2019, 06:59:57 PM
Quote from: Bill_S on September 02, 2019, 05:59:26 PM
I haven't laced up the Silver Stars yet. I've been reluctant to because my wife thinks that I bought only one pair of skates.  :-X

Lolllllllllllllllllll

This sounds like something I'd do.....
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on September 02, 2019, 07:05:32 PM
I did just lace up the Silver Stars. The holes for laces are small, the leather is stiff, so it's very hard to push the aglets through them. After a few minutes trying to lace a Silver Star boot, I thought that the aglets might suffer some damage. I went to the shop and used a woodworking awl to stretch the holes before lacing. This worked very, very well.

Last week, I spent a frustrating half an hour lacing ONE Fusion boot, but with the awl treatment, I was able to lace each Silver Star boot in under 5 minutes.

Highly effective!

(http://www.afterness.com/skating/images/boots_blades_2019/boots_awl_lacing-4-800px.jpg)

Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on September 02, 2019, 07:06:08 PM
Quote from: MCsAngel2 on September 02, 2019, 06:59:57 PM
Lolllllllllllllllllll

This sounds like something I'd do.....

Yeah, and it's probably not the last time that I'll do something like that!
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: FigureSpins on September 02, 2019, 11:09:31 PM
Quote from: Bill_S on September 02, 2019, 05:59:26 PM
I haven't laced up the Silver Stars yet. I've been reluctant to because my wife thinks that I bought only one pair of skates.  :-X

  :pop:  ;D ;D ;D

Too funny!

You could try not using the bottom-most holes.  That'll buy you a few inches of lace.
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Bill_S on September 03, 2019, 08:05:18 AM
Quote from: FigureSpins on September 02, 2019, 11:09:31 PM

You could try not using the bottom-most holes.  That'll buy you a few inches of lace.


Excellent suggestion!!!!

Thanks!
Title: Re: Anyone in Riedell 2010 Fusion boots?
Post by: Loops on September 03, 2019, 12:10:24 PM
Quote
....because my wife thinks that I bought only one pair of skates.

::>)  Like everyone else has said, I'm totally guilty of having done the same thing....Pic mounts?  What pic mounts?  :angel:

I like FigureSpins suggesting of skipping the bottom lace holes too.  I'd have never thought of that!